NB: This is a guest article by Steve Endacott, CEO of the On Holiday Group
Online and independent agents in the UK have never faced such a hidden and potentially disastrous regulation reform as Flight Plus.
If this were allowed to pass as originally proposed, any collapse of a charter, scheduled or low cost airline would wipe out 50% plus of retailers.
In essence this change would allow the Civil Aviation Authority neatly side step their requirement to protect customers money and pass the liability straight to any ATOL holding retailer.
Under current ATOL rules, any retailer holding an ATOL licence will be deemed to have brought seats from a charter airline on an ATOL to ATOL basis and hence any collapse would require them to replace the flights at their cost.
Many retailers already suffered at the hands of this rule during the XL collapse, which cost the Coop Travel £2 million alone in replacement seats.
However, the new scheme would mean low cost and scheduled flights would have to be bonded by at dynamic packaging retailers, there by greatly increasing the risk.
Although retailers can currently cover this risk by taking our specialist insurance policies such as Supplier Failure Cover or SAFI, the market for these products has dramatically shrunk post the collapse of Kiss and Goldtrail leaving only 2 players in the market.
Already costs are escalating and another collapse could easily see this market disappear leaving agents completely exposed.
Not only is Flight Plus dangerous to retailers it still does not deal with the fundamental imbalance in that airlines do not need to hold ATOL licences even though in most cases calls on the ATOL scheme are triggered by airline collapses.
How can it be reasonable that retailers need to hold licences to protect consumer monies when British Airways, which lost £980 million last year, does not?
The CAA is actually run by sensible and fair mined people, but the have a pressing need to refill their coffers after more airline collapse this summer.
They openly admit to having given up in the short term on persuading the UK government to take on airlines which have strong lobbies and hidden perks to offer (just see how many members of the UK parliament have Gold cards!). Therefore, they have been forced to push ahead with the dangerous fudge that is Flight Plus.
I can understand the CAA’s position, but I am frankly amazed that online and independent retailers are not up in arms.
The only conclusion you can reach is that they simply not seen the Tsunami which may wipe them from the face of the industry.
NB: This is a guest article by Steve Endacott, CEO of the On Holiday Group